Picasso responds to Kirsha Kaechele! #artnews

39 thoughts on “Picasso responds to Kirsha Kaechele! #artnews

  1. From what i know Picasso was a massive creep to his female models, pretending this was his work is another very intentional choice on her end

  2. Did people believe that there were genuine paintings in the exhibit? I only learned about it recently but I thought it was all a joke/performance.

  3. I thought the whole point was that she painted them 😭 like kinda parodying his work in a way? Idk maybe I just haven’t seen enough of his paintings but I love his style it’s not plagiarism to parody

  4. she’s responding to how unethically women are treated. who cares if it’s mildly “unethical” to recreate paintings from one of the most famous artists ever? picasso and his estate are fine.

  5. Is she trying to get people upset with her art? Like obviously it was the intention to piss off little dick men by not letting them into she art show. But was this the same? Like no such thing as bad publicity type of strategy?

  6. I think Kirsha Kaechele would have anticipated a negative response from Pablo Picasso's estate. Like, imagine the statements and interviews she's gonna release in response. Would have been iconic.

Comments are closed.