To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Who is this dumb bird, if she doesn’t recognise some of the most recognisable paintings in the collection?
Pink Floyd comes to mind. Pun intended 😊
A nothing burger
This was such a disappointing segment for me! I’d love to see the scientific version, where real information could be impressive.
I would love to try this when people are looking at my Art work, I like to get people thinking as they explore the visuals. Thank you for sharing
Decathlon warehouses usually
I may seem conservative on this matter, but I'm a little confused. Because…it's good for science to develop, but if people's sensibilities toward art become digitized, I fear it will be used in dark experiments to read people's minds. Or, conversely, I'm a little worried that AI will somehow intervene in our minds and they control our emotions without us even realizing it.
Please note how this person was walking past the artwork in the beginning not taking anything in. Then when she had the headset on she was trying to will herself to see more profoundly. 😂. 🤷🏽
📬🗣️✍️!!!!! HEY🏁 *WORLD 🌍 🆘🆘🆘🆘🆘 WHAT'S WRONG WITH (US) !!!!! ( ✓✓✓✓✓ """"" WE IMMEDIATELY NEED WORLD 🌍 PEACE NUMBER 1📯""""" ™ PEACE IN ONE PIECE 🧩 = ALL FOR ONE ONE FOR ALL , FOR 🕐 CAUSE """"" ✓✓✓✓✓)
( xxx WE DON'T NEED *WORLD 🌍 WAR NUMBER 3 ××× BETWEEN PIECES OF SPLINTERS GROUPS )
✓✓✓✓✓ !!!!!THERE IS ANOTHER WAY FOR US AND OUR TRUE PURPOSE WHICH IS TO TAKE AND TAKE CARE OF ALL OF CREATION ALL FOR ONE ONE FOR ALL !!!!! ✓✓✓✓✓.
Iran should clear about to neuclear weapons to avoid next war.
Wouldn't it be interesting to use this tool to identify neurodiverity if they already recognise a difference in patterns?
We don't need science to tell us that art is good for us (though it's still fascinating!). Just imagine a world without any art at all.
❤ fascinating to see and to experience
Why choose somebody, who looks like is being at the museum as a punishment. The reporter was so disinterested it was a bit uncomfortable to watch. Her comment on viewed art was incredibly ignorant. Choose your reporters wisely, BBC.
its where ribons intersect or meet
Stolen works included 😢
Add a video camera to the front of your unit to record what was being viewed in real time in accordance to the reading being recorded.
Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) is a program we run in grades 3, 4, and 5. We find that, with just one visit per month during the school year, it improves visual literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills.
It’s no surprise that art is so evocative, but I would have much preferred to see the reactions of someone who has more knowledge and interest in art.
I think expanding this concept into an hour-long program would allow for an in-depth exploration of how the brain responds.
Art contains the artist's energy and frequency that can be felt nearby or great distances. In other words, art gives off a vibrational frequency like an aura or remnant of its creator.
The reporter is bright, but she’s a philistine.
Why have a philistine report on art? Annoying.
Why is it that they have to shove the cameras so close into people's faces? Back off.
Are civilian victims HAVANA SYNDROME in reallity in illegal Scientific programmes/experiments in the race to develop AGI Neural Weapons/ artificial telepathy/sentience. Was Erin Valenti (Silicon Valley tech.Ceo.) a victim? She claimed that she was in a 'thought experiment' before being found dead in her car 5 days later. Nobody dares say they too are a victim.
Wh are the 'ghost prisoners' used to develop this?
Victim
It would be interesting to see what curves my brain produces when I paint or draw.
😍😍🥰🥰🤩🤩
Well.. i had my sexual awakening when i looked at the sistine chapel and the creation of adam.. so yeah.. art does something in your brain 😅
This experiment would be even more useful if people’s gaze was monitored simultaneously. Then it would be possible to measure responses to particular elements of an artwork.
Who cares? Learn about the mind and you'll be worth listening to.
This could be a profound subject, but why have an absolute bimbo as the reporter. Yuck.
I have always shunned the idea that art is secondary or terciary in the scale of needs. It's primary. It's right next to food, water, shelter. It's beauty and a world without beauty is a world of depression. Beauty is a need.
Art objects do not all produce the art experience.
The research using this particular person was not accurate because she was told about the test. So during the art viewing she over analysed the painting and the purpose of the test, instead of just enjoying the views.
That song was played in the sims 2 garden stuff pack😅
The other thing though, is that the reporter is also multitasking in communicating her feelings to the camera and to the viewers. Again, the brain's activity is going to be different to someone who is just in a gallery just admiring or studying a painting or sitting at home looking through a book of paintings.
Maybe someday we can hear the sounds inside our head
How about what it does when we look at creation? 🌱 🌅 🦒 🏔 🌺
Excuse me, but I didn't need any scientific study to know that art is an active experience. 😕 In fact, it's an experience that affects the entire body. When you're in front of a painting, sculpture, etc. emotions can be felt in the chest, hands, it runs through your entire person. I'm surprised that the journalist only has a superficial image of what she sees. What would happen if she saw abstract art?
In short, art is good for people.⭐
Kudos to everyone working to prove that fact. 👍
Greetings from Chile ❤
I definitely want to try this!